Evaluating the Strategies for Accessible Tourism in Cultural Heritage Sites: A Fuzzy SIWEC-RAWEC Methodology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/msa31202634

Keywords:

Accessible Tourism, Cultural Heritage Sites, Simple Weight Calculation, Ranking Alternatives with Weights of Criterion, Developing Countries, Management Support Systems

Abstract

Ensuring inclusive access for people with disabilities is essential to achieving true equality and equity, key principles of sustainable tourism development. However, cultural tourism sites often encounter significant challenges in realizing this goal. Focusing on the Village Museum in Africa, this study proposes an integrated framework that comprises simple weight calculation (SIWEC) and ranking alternatives with weights of criterion (RAWEC) methods within a fuzzy environment. First, data collection is conducted with four experts regarding six challenges and five strategies for accessible tourism in cultural heritage. While the SIWEC method assesses the weights of criteria, the RAWEC method ranks the strategies. The findings of the study indicate that insufficient funding and balancing site preservation with accessibility needs are the most critical challenges. Meanwhile, focused funding and resource development are the most appropriate strategies to overcome these challenges. Managers should implement adequate decision-support systems to direct dynamic and comprehensive planning and resource allocation for accessible tourism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zhelyazkova, I., Yarkova, Y., & Zheleva, A. (2007). Tourism for handicapped people responsibility and commitment in the period of Bulgaria's accession to the European Union. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 4(4), 39–43.

Darcy, S., & Dickson, T. J. (2009). A whole-of-life approach to tourism: The case for accessible tourism experiences. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1375/jhtm.16.1.32.

Ruhanen, L. M., Mclennan, C.-L. J., & Moyle, B. D. (2013). Strategic issues in the Australian tourism industry: A 10-year analysis of national strategies and plans. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 18(3), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2011.640701.

Kara, N. (2019). Assessment of Tanzania Tourism Policy of 1999 in Addressing the Needs of People With Disability. International Conference on the Future of Tourism (ICFT).

Darcy, S. (2002). Marginalised participation: Physical disability, high support needs and tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 9(1), 61–73.

Darcy, S., & Daruwalla, P. S. (1999). The trouble with Travel: People with disabilities and Tourism. Social Alternatives, 18(1), 41–46.

Lwoga, N. B., & Mapunda, B. B. (2017). Challenges facing accessible tourism in cultural heritage sites: The case of Village Museum in Tanzania. Revista de Turism-Studii și Cercetări în Turism, 24, 45-54.

Bouraima, M. B., Qiu, Y., Stević, Ž., & Simić, V. (2023). Assessment of alternative railway systems for sustainable transportation using an integrated IRN SWARA and IRN CoCoSo model. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 86, 101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101475.

Bouraima, M. B., Więckowski, J., & Qian, S. (2025). A decision support system for prioritizing electric vehicles transition policies. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 146, 104880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104880.

Demir, G., Pamucar, D., & Chatterjee, P. (2025). An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Framework for Evaluation of Sustainable Communication Technologies. Spectrum of Operational Research, 2(1), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor21202529.

Spencer, D. M., & Sargeant, E. L. (2024). The use of indicators to measure the sustainability of tourism at cultural heritage sites: A critical review. Tourism Recreation Research, 49(3), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2022.2069454.

Ismail, N., Masron, T., & Ahmad, A. (2014). Cultural heritage tourism in Malaysia: Issues and challenges. SHS Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20141201059.

Muštra, V., Perić, B. Š., & Pivčević, S. (2023). Cultural heritage sites, tourism and regional economic resilience. Papers in Regional Science, 102(3), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12731.

Zhuang, X., Yao, Y., & Li, J. (2019). Sociocultural impacts of tourism on residents of world cultural heritage sites in China. Sustainability, 11(3), 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030840.

Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Dupre, K., & McIlwaine, C. (2022). The impacts of world cultural heritage site designation and heritage tourism on community livelihoods: A Chinese case study. Tourism Management Perspectives, 43, 100994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100994.

Panzera, E., de Graaff, T., & de Groot, H. L. (2021). European cultural heritage and tourism flows: The magnetic role of superstar World Heritage Sites. Papers in Regional Science, 100(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12562.

García-Hernández, M., De la Calle-Vaquero, M., & Yubero, C. (2017). Cultural heritage and urban tourism: Historic city centres under pressure. Sustainability, 9(8), 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081346.

Salehipour, M., Kazemi, N., Jokar Arsanjani, J., & Karimi Firozjaei, M. (2025). Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Model to Unlock Sustainable Heritage Tourism Potential. Sustainability, 17(8), 3703. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083703.

Dong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, H., & Wu, J. (2025). Study on the interaction mechanism among spatial patterns of traditional villages and tourism attractiveness and accessibility in Guizhou province. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 10365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94514-z.

Moreno, C., Gall, C., Woo, J., Lee, D., & Bencekri, M. (2025). Assessing accessibility of cultural sites through the 15-minute city framework in Seoul. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 29(1), 8–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2025.2462820.

Puška, A., Nedeljković, M., Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., & Simić, V. (2024). Application of the new simple weight calculation (SIWEC) method in the case study in the sales channels of agricultural products. MethodsX, 13, 102930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.102930.

Badi, I., Baryannis, G., & Bouraima, M. B. (2025). Decision Support for Railway Infrastructure Planning Using the SIWEC-RAWEC Framework. In X International Conference New Horizons of Transport and Communications 2025.

Katrancı, A., Kundakcı, N., & Arman, K. (2026). Fuzzy SIWEC and Fuzzy RAWEC methods for sustainable waste disposal technology selection. Spectrum of Operational Research, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor31202633.

Şimşek, E., Eti, S., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2026). Evaluation of Purchasing Process in Solar Energy Investment Projects via SIWEC Methodology. Spectrum of Operational Research, 81–86. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor31202636.

Štilić, A., Bosna, J., Puška, A., & Nedeljković, M. (2025). Examining Tourism Valorization of Botanical Gardens Through a Fuzzy SiWeC-TOPSIS Framework. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens, 6(4), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg6040055.

Yalçın, G. C., Limon, E. G., Kara, K., Limon, O., Gürol, P., Deveci, M., Demirayak, Ö., & Tomášková, H. (2025). A hybrid decision support system for transport policy selection: A case study on Russia's Northern Sea route in Artic region. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 98, 102171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102171.

Cao, J., Spulbar, C., Eti, S., Horobet, A., Yüksel, S., & Dincer, H. (2025). Innovative approaches to green digital twin technologies of sustainable smart cities using a novel hybrid decision-making system. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(1), 100651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100651.

Çizmecioğlu, S., Çalık, A., & Tirkolaee, E. B. (2025). An integrated p, q-quasirung orthopair fuzzy decision-making approach for strategic selection of competitive intelligence platforms. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 158, 111498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111498.

Puška, A., Božanić, D., Štilić, A., Nedeljković, M., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2025). Application of fuzzy-rough methodology to the selection of electric tractors for small farms in Semberija. Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications, e212931.

Eti, S., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Çırak, A. N., Deveci, M., & Kadry, S. (2025). Strategy building for renewable energy adoption in regionalized supply chains-based logistic systems using a hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 101479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101479.

Puška, A., Štilić, A., Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., & Nedeljković, M. (2024). Introducing a Novel multi-criteria Ranking of Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (RAWEC) model. MethodsX, 12, 102628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.102628.

Nedeljković, M., Puška, A., Pamučar, D., & Marinković, D. (2024). Selection of agricultural product sales channels using fuzzy double MEREC and fuzzy RAWEC method. Agriculture and Forestry, 70(3), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.70.3.03.

Puška, A., Nedeljković, M., Dudić, B., Štilić, A., & Mittelman, A. (2024). Improving agricultural sustainability in Bosnia and Herzegovina through renewable energy integration. Economies, 12(8), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12080195.

Petrović, N., Jovanović, V., Marković, S., Marinković, D., & Petrović, M. (2024). Multicriteria sustainability assessment of transport modes: A European Union case study for 2020. Journal of Green Economy and Low-Carbon Development, 3(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.56578/jgelcd030104.

Demir, G., & Ulusoy, E. I. (2024). Wind Power Plant Location Selection with Fuzzy Logic and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods. Computer and Decision Making: An International Journal, 1, 211–234. https://doi.org/10.59543/comdem.v1i.10713.

Dündar, S., & Karadağ, İ. (2025). Selection of a Facility Location for a Cosmetics Company by Integrated F-LBWA and I-RAWEC Methods. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01960-4.

Mukhametzyanov, I. Z., & Pamucar, D. (2025). Equivalence of MCDM Methods and Synthesis of Solution Based on Ratings Obtained in Different Models. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 8(2), 1–20.

Tešić, D., Božanić, D., Mondal, S. P., & Puška, A. (2025). Modification of the Ranking of Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (RAWEC) Method and Improvement with Fermatean Fuzzy numbers. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 3(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.31181/jscda31202570.

Badi, I., Bouraima, M. B., & Maraka, N. D. (2026). A Hybrid Simulation and the RAWEC Model for Performance Evaluation of Pharmacy Service Strategies. Decision Making Advances. https://doi.org/10.31181/dma412026127.

Reyes-García, M. E., Criado-García, F., Camúñez-Ruíz, J. A., & Casado-Pérez, M. (2021). Accessibility to cultural tourism: The case of the major museums in the city of Seville. Sustainability, 13(6), 3432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063432.

Sørmoen, O., Arenghi, A., & Garofolo, I. (2016). Accessibility as a key enabling knowledge for enhancement of cultural heritage.

Bakari, S. J., Bouraima, M. B., Aytekin, A., & Ntow-Gyan, K. (2025). Proposing appropriate strategies for domestic tourism promotion in developing country by fuzzy fermatean MCDM approach. Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, 12(2), 246–270. https://doi.org/10.22105/jarie.2025.489833.1713.

Basuri, T., Gazi, K. H., Das, S. G., & Sankar Prasad Mondal. (2026). Ranking Higher Education Institutions Using Entropy–VIKOR with Generalized Pentagonal Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers. Journal of Contemporary Decision Science, 2(1), 64-83.

Published

2026-01-09

How to Cite

Bouraima, M. B., & Badi, I. . (2026). Evaluating the Strategies for Accessible Tourism in Cultural Heritage Sites: A Fuzzy SIWEC-RAWEC Methodology. Management Science Advances, 3(1), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.31181/msa31202634