Selecting Product Species for Aquaculture Companies: A Spherical Fuzzy DelphiCRADIS Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/msa31202639Keywords:
Aquaculture Management, Marine Aquaculture Species, t-Spherical Fuzzy Sets, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Delphi, Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal SolutionAbstract
Developments in the aquaculture sector have broadened the commercial reach of products. Parallel to this expansion, seafood is becoming increasingly important in human nutrition due to its low cost and high protein content. This study seeks to identify marine aquaculture species that can be cultivated in the Eastern Black Sea Region. It also determines the criteria used in marine aquaculture species evaluation. In this regard, the importance of the criteria and the degree of preference for the management options are determined. To accomplish these objectives, the t-spherical fuzzy-Delphi-subjective weighting approach-compromise ranking of alternatives from distance to ideal solution (CRADIS) methodology is employed. The study finds that euryhaline capability, ecosystem effect, habitat suitability, and temperature tolerance are important determinants in seafood aquaculture production. Rainbow trout is the most ideal option, followed by Black Sea salmon, brown trout, seabass, and seabream. The study emphasizes the importance of environmental, sustainable, and customer-focused principles in marine aquaculture management.
Downloads
References
G n, A., & K1zak, V. (2019). D nyada ve T rkiyede su r nleri retiminde istatistiki durum. Menba Kastamonu niversitesi Su r nleri Fak ltesi Dergisi, 5(2), 25-36.
Demircan, M. (2022). 0klim Dei_ikliinin T rkiye Denizlerine ve Su r nleri Yeti_tiriciliine Etkisi. JENAS Journal of Environmental and Natural Studies, 4(2), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.53472/jenas.1096917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53472/jenas.1096917
Food, & Nations, A. O. of the U. (2016). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. FAO Rome.
Atar, H. H., & Ataman, T. G. (2016). 0klim dei_ikliinin su r nleri yeti_tiricilii zerindeki etkileri. Ziraat M hendislii, 363, 17-22.
Arslan, G., & Y1ld1z, P. O. (2021). T rkiye su r nleri sekt r ne genel bak1_. Menba Kastamonu niversitesi Su r nleri Fak ltesi Dergisi, 7(1), 46-57.
Had1k, 0. E., U ar, U. U., Atak, M., & 0_leyen, S. K. (2020). A Decision Support System for Determining the Suitable Fish Species to Fish Farms. End stri M hendislii, 31(3), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.46465/endustrimuhendisligi.788918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46465/endustrimuhendisligi.788918
Akbulut, B. (2004). Su r nleri yeti_tiricilii ve stratejileri. Aquaculture Studies, 2004(1), 9-11.
Ba_ 1nar, N. (2004). D nyada su r nleri yeti_tiricilii ve lkemizin geleceine bak1_. Aquaculture Studies, 2004(1), 6-8.
avdar, Y. (2009). Su r nleri yeti_tiriciliinde desteklemeler. Aquaculture Studies, 2009(1), 17-20.
Datekin, M., & Ak, O. (2007). Dou karadeniz b lgesinde su r nleri t ketimi, ihracat ve ithalat potansiyeli. Aquaculture Studies, 2007(3), 14-17.
Demir, E. (2014). Ni in k lt r bal1k 1l11. In Avrupa Bal1k Yeti_tiricilii El Kitab1. anakkale Onsekiz Mart niversitesi.
S nmez, R., & Alpbaz, A. (1977). Su r nleri yeti_tiricilii ve gelecei. Hayvansal retim, 7(1), 1-4.
Y1ld1r1m, ., & Okumu_, 0. (2004). Mula 0linde Su r nleri Yeti_tiricilii ve T rkiye Su r nleri Yeti_tiriciliindeki Yeri. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 21(3), 361-364.
Tekeliolu, N., Kumlu, M., Yanar, M., & Er en, Z. (2007). T rkiyede su r nleri retimi sekt r n n durumu ve sorunlar1.
Babaolu, A. ., & Emirolu, D. 0. (2016). Avrupa Birliine uyum s recinde deniz bal1klar1 yeti_tiricilik i_letmelerinin deerlendirilmesi Assessment of Turkish mariculture enterprises within the context of European Union harmonization process. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 33(4), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.2016.33.4.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.2016.33.4.03
Ko ak, E. (2018). A 1k-deniz orkinos bal1k yeti_tiricilii ve yasal s1n1rlamalar1n b y k l ekli bir tesis rnei zerinden incelenmesi. Nide mer Halisdemir niversitesi M hendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 558-565. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.443592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.443592
teli, F. (2023). r n raporu- su r nleri (Tar1msal Ekonomi ve Politika Geli_tirme Enstit s (TEPGE) No. 373). T.C. Tar1m ve Orman Bakanl11.
Akbulut, B., Kurtoglu, I. Z., st ndag, E., & Aksungur, M. (2009). Karadeniz b lgesinde balik yetistiriciliginin tarihsel gelisimi ve gelecek projeksiyonu. Journal of FisheriesSciences. Com, 3(2), 76.
Y cel, ^. (2006). Orta Karadeniz B lgesi bal1k 1l11 ve bal1k 1lar1n sosyo-ekonomik durumu.
G m _, E., & Y1lmaz, S. (2011). Antalya 0linde su r nleri yeti_tiricilik sekt r ve pazarlama durumu. Mehmet Akif Ersoy niversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstit s Dergisi, 2(1), 15-31.
K1rda, K. (2016). Dou Karadeniz B lgesinde Bal1k 1l1k. Karadeniz Ara_t1rmalar1, 13(52), 233-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12787/KARAM1126
Y1ld1r1m, A. (2014). Ordu ve Trabzon illerinde deniz bal11 yeti_tiricilii yapan i_letmelerin yap1sal analizi. Masters Thesis, Fen Bilimleri Enstit s , Turkey.
Polat, H., & Erg n, H. (2008). Karadenizin Pelajik Bal1klar1. Aquaculture Studies, 2008(1), 1-5.
Dalk1ran, G. (2019). T rkiye Su r nleri Yeti_tiricilii 0_letmelerinin Uluslararas1 Rekabet ilik Durumu zerine Bir Ara_t1rma (Tez no 605898). Karab k niversitesi Lisans st Eitim Enstit s 0_letme Anabilim Dal1, Yay1nlanmam1_ Doktora Tezi, Ocak, s165.
z_ahinolu, I. (2022). Sorular ile su r nleri yeti_tiricilii. In Modern yeti_tiricilikte sistem kullan1m1 ve g n m zdeki durumu. 0KSAD Yay1nlar1.
Kurt, K. C., Diler, A., & Bayrak, H. (2023). G kku_a1 Alabal11 0_letmelerinde Bal1k Refah1n1n Deerlendirilmesi zerine Bir al1_ma. Akademik Et ve S t Kurumu Dergisi, 6, 11-20.
Koca, S. B., Terzi Olu, S., Di Di Nen, B. I., & Yi i T, N. . (2009). S rd r lebilir Su r nleri Yeti_tiriciliinde evre Dostu retim. Ankara niversitesi evrebilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1501/Csaum_0000000049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1501/Csaum_0000000049
Emre, Y., Say1n, C., Ki_tin, F., & Emre, N. (2008). T rkiyede a kafeste alabal1k yeti_tiricilii, kar_1la_1lan sorunlar ve z m nerileri. S leyman Demirel niversitesi Eirdir Su r nleri Fak ltesi Dergisi, 4(1), 65-73.
Keskin, E., & Atar, H. H. (2011). Su r nleri Yeti_tiricilii Doal Bal1k Stoklar1 0li_kisi. Ziraat M hendislii, 356, 4-9.
Turan, F., G raa , R., & SAYIN, S. (2012). Su r nleri yeti_tiriciliinde esansiyel yalar. T rk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi, 5(1), 35-40.
Ullah, K., Mahmood, T., & Jan, N. (2018). Similarity measures for T-spherical fuzzy sets with applications in pattern recognition. Symmetry, 10(6), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10060193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10060193
G r n, . F., Chatterjee, P., Aytekin, A., Korucuk, S., & Pamucar, D. (2025). Strategic analysis of e-trade platforms in automotive spare part sector: A T-Spherical fuzzy perspective. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 44, 100782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2025.100782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2025.100782
Saad, M., & Rafiq, A. (2022). Novel similarity measures for T-spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition and clustering. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 43(5), 6321-6331. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-220289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-220289
Akram, M., Naz, S., Feng, F., Ali, G., & Shafiq, A. (2023). Extended MABAC method based on 2-tuple linguistic T-spherical fuzzy sets and Heronian mean operators: An application to alternative fuel selection. AIMS Mathematics, 8(5), 10619-10653. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023539
Debnath, K., & Roy, S. K. (2023). Power partitioned neutral aggregation operators for T-spherical fuzzy sets: An application to H2 refuelling site selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 216, 119470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119470
Aytekin, A., Korucuk, S., Bedirhanolu, ^. B., & Simic, V. (2024). Selecting the ideal sustainable green strategy for logistics companies using a T-spherical fuzzy-based methodology. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 127, 107347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107347
Shafiq, A., Naz, S., Butt, S. A., & Pi eres-Espitia, G. (2024). Enhancing learning environments with IoT: A novel decision-making approach using probabilistic linguistic T-spherical fuzzy set. The Journal of Supercomputing, 80(12), 1752417574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06129-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06129-2
Fetanat, A., & Tayebi, M. (2025). Sustainability and availability prioritization of solar thermal energy technologies for enhanced oil recovery using T-spherical fuzzy set-based ordinal priority approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 27(6), 2585-2614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-03047-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-03047-y
Qiao, L., & Qi, X. (2025). Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making algorithm for music composition evaluation using T-spherical fuzzy sets. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 26(12), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICT.2025.146165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICT.2025.146165
Khorshidikia, S., Rismanchian, M., & Habibi, E. (2024). A narrative review on the application of Delphi and fuzzy Delphi techniques in the cement industry. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 80(4), 1507-1517. https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241297468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241297468
Gupta, N., Garg, P., & Ahuja, N. (2025). An integrated pythagorean fuzzy delphi-AHP-CoCoSo approach for exploring barriers and mitigation strategies for sustainable supply chain in the food industry. Supply Chain Analytics, 10, 100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2025.100105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2025.100105
Aytekin, A., 0stanbullu, B., & Kara, K. (2025). Current Problems and Solutions of Certified Public Accountants in T rkiye. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 3(1), 210-227. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202550a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202550a
Saha, A., Pamucar, D., Gorcun, O. F., & Mishra, A. R. (2023). Warehouse site selection for the automotive industry using a fermatean fuzzy-based decision-making approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 211, 118497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118497
Puaka, A., Nedeljkovi , M., Prodanovi , R., Vladisavljevi , R., & Suzi , R. (2022). Market assessment of pear varieties in Serbia using fuzzy CRADIS and CRITIC methods. Agriculture, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020139
Mert, A. S., & Aytekin, A. (2025). An interval-valued spherical fuzzy SWARA-CRADIS approach to strategic problem-solving in local media businesses. Journal of Process Management and New Technologies, 13(3-4), 54-77. https://doi.org/10.5937/jpmnt13-62481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/jpmnt13-62481
Puaka, A., Nedeljkovi , M., Stojanovi , I., & Bo~ani , D. (2023). Application of fuzzy TRUST CRADIS method for selection of sustainable suppliers in agribusiness. Sustainability, 15(3), 2578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032578
Ashraf, S., Iqbal, W., Hameed, M. S., Simic, V., & Bacanin, N. (2024). An enhanced CRADIS decision model for optimizing radioactive waste reduction through transmutations based on disc spherical fuzzy information. Applied Soft Computing, 167, 112289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112289
Qiu, K., Chen, J., Ashraf, S., & Shahid, T. (2024). Strategic decision support system with probabilistic linguistic term sets: Extended CRADIS approach for supply chain risk management in sports industry. IEEE Access, 13, 32853-32862. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3416391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3416391
Abac1olu, S., Ayan, B., & Pamucar, D. (2025). The Race to Sustainability: Decoding Green University Rankings Through a Comparative Analysis (20182022). Innovative Higher Education, 50(1), 241-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09734-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09734-4
I_1k, ., & Adalar, 0. (2025). A multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment based on the extended CRADIS method under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study of Turkish non-life insurers. Neural Computing and Applications, 37(5), 3317-3342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10803-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10803-0
Aytekin, A., K k, H. ., Aytekin, M., Simic, V., & Pamucar, D. (2025). Evaluation of international market entry strategies for mineral oil companies using a neutrosophic SWARA-CRADIS methodology. Applied Soft Computing, 174, 112976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112976
Kumar, R., & Simic, V. (2025). FinTech Research Mapping: A Citation-based Bibliometric Analysis. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 3(1), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202544k. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202544k
Ju, Y., Liang, Y., Luo, C., Dong, P., Gonzalez, E. D. S., & Wang, A. (2021). T-spherical fuzzy TODIM method for multi-criteria group decision-making problem with incomplete weight information. Soft Computing, 25(4), 2981-3001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05357-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05357-x
Bouraima, M. B., Dong, S., Aytekin, A., Yang, Z., Zolfani, S. H., & Qian, S. (2025). Assessing sustainability in BRI railway projects with a novel integrated fuzzy methodology. Transport, 40(3), 197-229. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2025.25439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2025.25439
Budescu, D. V., & Chen, E. (2015). Identifying Expertise to Extract the Wisdom of Crowds. Management Science, 61(2), 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1909
Bojke, L., Soares, M., Claxton, K., Colson, A., Fox, A., Jackson, C., Jankovic, D., Morton, A., Sharples, L., & Taylor, A. (2021). Developing a reference protocol for structured expert elicitation in health-care decision-making: A mixed-methods study. Health Technology Assessment, 25(37), 1. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta25370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta25370
Aytekin, A. (2022). ok kriterli karar analizi. Nobel Bilimsel Eserler.
Altinok, I., & Grizzle, J. M. (2001). Effects of brackish water on growth, feed conversion and energy absorption efficiency by juvenile euryhaline and freshwater stenohaline fishes. Journal of Fish Biology, 59(5), 1142-1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb00181.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.2001.1722
Dikel, S. (2006). Tuzlusu Ortamlar1nda Tilapia Yeti_tiricilii. Su r nleri Dergisi, 23(2), 199-204.
Verep, B., & Balta, F. (2023). T rkiyenin Dou Karadeniz k1y1lar1nda deniz kafeslerinde bal1k yeti_tiricilii potansiyeli ve s rd r lebilir evre. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 8(4), 679-690. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1388002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1388002
akmak, E., zel, O. T., M1s1r, D. S., D zg ne_, Z. D., & rnek, V. (2025). T rkiyede Karadeniz somonu (Salmo labrax Pallas, 1814) bal1k 1l11n1n d n _ m seyri. Ege Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 42(1), 70-84. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.42.1.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.42.1.10
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muazzez Kartal, Ahmet Aytekin (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









